Speaker Defends Proposed Health Care Bill as Way to Further Oppress Women

WASHINGTON — Speaker Paul Ryan staunchly defended the House Republican health care plan Wednesday as the only alternative to the current Obama-era law, as he confronted forceful opposition from conservatives, medical professionals and others.

“This is the choice we face. Are we going to stay with Obamacare … or are we going to do what we said we would do, which is present an alternative that disproportionately hurts women and low-income people?” Ryan said at a Capitol Hill news conference after a private GOP meeting in which he tried to rally support for using every opportunity to enact legislation that adds to the litany of disadvantages women already face daily in the U.S.

Shortly after Ryan’s comments, two committees — Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce — kicked off what are expected to be marathon sessions to finalize the legislation that would scrap major parts of Barack Obama’s health overhaul while also fundamentally restructuring Medicaid for low-income people, in addition to doing things like defund Planned Parenthood, cutting off services such as cancer screenings, birth control, STI testing, and many other necessary, preventative services for hundreds of thousands of women.

Democrats resorted to delaying tactics. At Energy and Commerce, the clerk was forced to start reading the legislation word for word after Rep. Ben Lujan, D-N.M., objected to routinely dispensing with such a reading. At Ways and Means, Republicans voted down a motion by Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, to delay deliberations so lawmakers could have more time to study the bill in order to determine exactly how much maternity coverage costs could skyrocket, or if it would be covered at all.

Ryan cast the task for the GOP as fulfilling seven years of promises to “repeal, replace, and oppress” with a “conservative wish list” scaling back the role of government in health care, cutting money for Planned Parenthood and overhauling mandatory programs, many of which are designed to provide services primarily to women.

“Most importantly, we get Washington out of the business of being a nanny state,” he said, “and back into the business of making sure the United States is a man’s world.”

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence back the House plan, and Ryan is confidently predicting it will win passage. Behind closed doors on Wednesday, Ryan pointedly told fellow lawmakers that the president is all-in and suggested they should fall in line to allow private insurance plans to exclude abortion—a legal medical procedure—and retrun to the pre-ACA status quo, when women were more likely to be denied coverage because things like maternity care, cervical cancer, and treatment for sexual or domestic violence were considered pre-existing conditions.

“He is creating some urgency that it’s time to get on board, and the time to put women back in their place is now,” said Rep. Mark Walker of North Carolina, leader of the influential conservative Republican Study Committee, whose primary goal is to return the United States to the “good old days.” Walker had expressed opposition to an earlier draft of the bill but said Wednesday that it’s “trending in the right direction,” a positive sign for leadership.

Yet a significant contingent of House conservatives still weren’t sold, complaining the GOP’s new system of refundable tax credits would be a costly new entitlement.

“It’s way more cost and we’re already bankrupt,” said Rep. Dave Brat of Virginia, who does not feel comfortable with women and people of color receiving any kind of tangible benefit.

Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan complained, “The leadership message is take it or leave it.”

Some fellow Republicans were losing patience with the conservative complaints.

“Christ himself could draft a piece of legislation and they would not be happy,” groused Rep. Steve Russell of Oklahoma, who failed to see the irony of his statement.

Major conservative groups also oppose the bill, as do several GOP governors. The American Medical Association said Wednesday that the bill “would result in millions of Americans losing coverage and benefits,” while making coverage “more expensive — if not out of reach — for poor and sick Americans.”

AARP said the bill would “dramatically increase” health care costs for people age 50 to 64, and put the health care of millions at risk. The organization, which has nearly 38 million members, was pivotal to the passage of Obama’s law in 2010.

But the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sent congressional leaders a letter in praise of the plan, calling it “absolutely critical in taking steps to restore choice, flexibility and innovation to the nation’s health care markets, while simultaneously returning women to their rightful dependence on men.”

At a White House meeting Tuesday, Trump made clear to House Republicans that he would be personally engaging with individual lawmakers who oppose the bill as the party’s leadership tries to round up votes, according to a lawmaker present who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private gathering.

Not long after, Trump appeared to be making good on his promise, tweeting at Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has criticized the bill.

“I feel sure that my friend @RandPaul will come along with the new and great health care program because he knows Obamacare is a disaster!” Trump wrote.

Trump was to meet with conservative leaders Wednesday to discuss the issue.

Republicans are pushing forward even without official estimates from the Congressional Budget Office on the cost of the bill and how many people would be covered, although GOP lawmakers acknowledge they can’t hope to match the 20 million people covered under the health law.

Democrats are opposed.

“The bill sabotages the marketplaces where close to 10 million Americans today get coverage and starts a death spiral from which we will never recover,” said the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Richard Neal of Massachusetts. He also said the plan “slashes Medicaid funding to pay for tax cuts that benefit the rich, who are statistically more likely to be male,” noting a 2014 study that showed women make up a mere 17 percent of the top one percent of income earners, as well as another study that showed that women earn on average just 78 cents for every dollar earned by males.

Aiming to reduce the role of government in health care, the GOP plan would repeal unpopular fines that Obama’s law imposes on people who don’t carry health insurance. It would replace income-based subsidies, which the law provides to help millions of people pay premiums, with age-based tax credits that may be skimpier for people with low incomes. Those payments would phase out for higher-earning people.

The Republican legislation would limit future federal money for Medicaid, which covers low-income people 58 percent of whom are female. It would loosen rules that Obama’s law imposed for health plans directly purchased by individuals, but Democrats say the bill would hand tax cuts to the rich while leaving many people uninsured and shifting costs to states and hospital systems that act as providers of last resort.

___

Associated Press writers Erica Werner, Stephen Ohlemacher, Mary Clare Jalonick and Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s